Which statement demonstrates an unambiguous invocation of the right to remain silent?

• A. I do not wish to answer any questions
• B. I would like to continue questioning
• C. I might talk later
• D. I want to help you investigators

Answer: (A)

An unambiguous invocation happens when the person clearly states they do not want to answer questions. The phrase “I do not wish to answer any questions” communicates a definite desire to stop talking, leaving no doubt about the wish to remain silent. When that clear request is made, officers must immediately stop questioning on the matter.

The other statements don’t meet that standard because they imply a willingness to continue talking or are ambiguous about whether they want to stop speaking. For example, expressing a desire to talk later or to help investigators signals openness to speak, not a definite request to remain silent.

In practice, once a clear invocation is made, interrogation on the same issue should pause, and the person should only be approached again if they or the circumstances reinitiate contact or if counsel becomes involved and the person chooses to waive those rights.