Can a person be convicted on a confession alone?

• A. Yes
• B. No
• C. Only with corroborating physical evidence
• D. Depends on jurisdiction

Answer: (B)

Confession alone is not enough to convict because the law requires independent evidence to corroborate the statement and prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. A confession may be admitted if it’s voluntary, but the trier of fact must have other evidence that supports that the defendant committed the crime; without corroboration, a conviction on a single admission is unsafe and often prohibited. The corroborating evidence can be eyewitness testimony, physical evidence, surveillance, or other documentation that connects the suspect to the crime. The concept protects against false confessions resulting from coercion, duress, mental illness, or misrepresentation. Therefore, you cannot base a conviction solely on a confession; you need additional evidence to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The other options imply the confession alone could suffice or depend on jurisdiction, which does not align with the general rule taught here.